I'm raising money for a cause I care about, but I need your help to reach my goal! Please become a supporter to follow my progress and share with your friends.
Subscribe to follow campaign updates!
Global currency dynamics rarely shift quickly, but the expanding BRICS coalition—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, joined by Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Ethiopia in 2024—has accelerated discussions about alternatives to dollar dominance. Jack Truong, drawing from his experience leading multinational corporations across volatile economic periods, argues that historical precedent and current economic realities make successful BRICS currency implementation unlikely.
Historical Currency Transition Patterns
Truong emphasizes that currency dominance transitions require extraordinary circumstances beyond economic size. "History teaches us that widespread currency adoption does not happen overnight," he explains. "Despite the American economy eclipsing that of the British Empire in the early 20th century, it took decades of trust building, rapid economic expansion, and tectonic global events—including an American-led Allied victory in WWII—for the U.S. dollar to be crowned the world's reserve currency in 1944."The Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 established the dollar's reserve currency status only after the British Empire's economy had collapsed during World War II and other major economies lay in ruins. This historical context underscores Truong's argument about the extraordinary circumstances required for currency transitions.
"US dollars still did not become a reserve currency until near the end of World War II when the economy of the British Empire pretty much collapsed because of the war. And then of course they lost all of those colonies. And then all the Western European country economies were destroyed. Japan's economy was destroyed. Russia was destroyed," Truong explains in his analysis.
Contemporary Dollar Dominance Metrics
Current economic data supports Truong's skepticism about rapid BRICS currency adoption. According to his research, the U.S. dollar participates in approximately 90% of foreign exchange transactions globally and handles 47% of global payments, while the Chinese renminbi—likely the dominant component of any BRICS currency—accounts for less than 5% of global payments.
"90% of the SWIFT, really the transaction across the world, it's still done based on US dollars. And then 48% or 50% of the goods are still traded based on the US dollar, whereas only 2% of that is the Chinese renminbi," Truong notes.
This usage disparity creates what economists call network effects, where the dollar's widespread adoption incentivizes further adoption, creating barriers for alternative currencies to gain traction.
Gold Reserve Analysis
Truong identifies gold reserves as another structural barrier to BRICS currency viability. Despite aggressive gold accumulation by China, India, and Russia, he points to data showing "the U.S. central bank's gold reserve is still more than 48% of the BRICS countries' gold reserves combined."
However, Truong also acknowledges fundamental changes in the relationship between currencies and gold backing. "Because of all of this printing of the US dollars during the past several decades, and many wars that we have started since 1971, the Vietnam War, you got the Iraq War, you got all this war that we have to fund. So the government has to print the money, so our money supply and GDP now is a lot bigger than all the gold that is available."
This evolution suggests that while gold reserves remain symbolically important for currency credibility, the mathematical impossibility of backing current money supplies with available gold reserves affects all currencies, including potential BRICS alternatives.
Coordination Challenges Among BRICS Members
Truong emphasizes the practical difficulties of currency coordination among BRICS members with divergent economic structures and political systems. "Brazil focuses on agricultural and mining sectors, Russia on energy reserves, India on services and a burgeoning technology sector, and South Africa is in the process of diversifying its mining-centric economy," he explains.
"And then there is China, a manufacturing behemoth with global infrastructure investments and domestic market woes. This intricate web of competing economic agendas will quickly entangle any currency initiative."
The political reality of achieving consensus among these diverse economies creates what Truong sees as an insurmountable coordination problem. "Can you imagine trying to get Putin and Xi and Modi all sitting in the same room and agreeing on one direction? Good luck!" he observes.
Institutional Stability Comparisons
Truong contrasts American institutional stability with the challenges facing BRICS nations. "America's diverse economy, political stability, and military prowess endow the U.S. dollar with robust integrity and strength," he argues. "U.S. institutions are known for transparency, predictability, and a strong adherence to the rule of law, cultivating a high level of global confidence in the dollar."
BRICS countries face what Truong identifies as "economic volatility, authoritarian governance issues, and geopolitical uncertainties" that impede universal acceptance of their currencies. These institutional weaknesses become particularly problematic for reserve currency status, which requires high levels of international trust.
Technological Acceleration Factors
While acknowledging that technological advancement might accelerate currency transition timelines, Truong maintains that digital innovation alone cannot overcome fundamental economic and political barriers. "And then now with the advent of digital and AI, the speed of change will be even faster," he concedes. However, he argues that "the BRICS won't become that reserve currency anytime soon."
Economic Infrastructure Dependencies
Truong points to the extensive infrastructure supporting dollar transactions as another barrier to BRICS currency adoption. Decades of investment in clearing systems, settlement mechanisms, and financial instruments denominated in dollars create switching costs that would burden any alternative currency system.
Creating comparable infrastructure for a BRICS currency would require enormous investment and coordination—complicated by the lack of consensus among member nations about implementation details and control mechanisms.
Long-term Strategic Implications
Despite his skepticism about BRICS currency success, Truong warns against American complacency. "The true test for the USD lies not in an external threat like the BRICS initiative, but rather from the internal challenges of achieving governmental cohesion and fiscal policy effectiveness," he cautions.
Truong's analysis suggests that while BRICS currency initiatives face structural barriers that make success unlikely, American monetary dominance depends on maintaining fiscal discipline and policy coherence rather than simply relying on incumbent advantages.
His framework positions current BRICS currency discussions as symptoms of broader dissatisfaction with dollar-based systems rather than viable alternatives capable of displacing established monetary infrastructure in the foreseeable future.
Sign in with your Facebook account or email.